I use AfterShot Pro 3, so I won't have a COW.
It's my granddaughters play tonight so, I'll be getting a raft of 3200 ISO low light shots to use when testing all the perspective RAW noise reduction applications.
If you have the software (or trials of it), I would suggest using DxO Photolab or PureRaw, then final process in Topaz Photo AI. I've experimented with countless apps, and settled on this process. It helps that they are both automated if you want them to be, so very larges batches can be processed with surprisingly good results.
DXO Photolab 7 has an AI noise reduction process built in.
I hate the process that I'll need to go through but Topaz, DXO and Luminar all have to be tested before I make the plunge.
I need to watch for getting my head up my butt because an application is more easily assimilated. By that I mean DXO is built to work exactly as I already work so I don't want to jump to an incorrect conclusion just because the glove fits.
Oh, I get that. It will be interesting to see which way you go with this.
I'm significantly nuts, and this will be an intense time. 30 days is not enough time to evaluate a professional level application professionally.
I'm also going to try the newly released Nikon RAW converter and consider an old school concept of pure developer concept of RAW conversion with enhancements all done post conversion.
I tried that technique with the Nikon and AfterShot Pro applications on some previously more interesting images and had some solid results with improved saturation, vibrance and RAW noise reduction. The reds in flowers, birds and iridescent blues on birds were improved significantly using software I've had for years in new ways.
All of this is well and good but to get a nice image and motion freeze at ISO 6400 in summer shade requires the new AI noise reduction must be acquired.
MY BRAIN HURTS!