I'm posting a link to a two page PDF, the first page is an image as received from a professional photographer VIA my client, MAC Photoshop CC, as viewed in Photo-PAINT 2017 at 33%. The second is after a little love.
The issue is that the image creator couldn't see the issue and in Photo-PAINT it jumped out and bit you in the face. If the image was printed at 100 DPI on an inkjet some of the blinding white lines would have been over 1/10th of an inch.
Photo-PAINT 2017 has the best display for real image editing.
http://www.graphictechnology.com/train/
Hi David,
Knock it off.The monitor display is no different for Photopaint, Photoshop, PaintShopPro, etc.
The monitor display these days is determined by the color management of the operating system - not the application.
An exception will occur if:1. The original photo was taken in Adobe RGB. The profile is not recognized by Photopaint.2. You have not used Photoshop's color management correctly. See below.
I happen to use Photopaint as my primary photo editor. I have posted the reasons. There is no reason to put up fake claims.Phil
Let me add:
1. Photopaint X8 is worse than useless. It's torture to even open it up.
2. My big problem with Photoshop is the total lack of an interface -- not even a "standard" toolbar.
3. The grandchildren improved the overall color of your image. They said that the original wall colors were "dinky".
4. It took them seven seconds in Photoshop.Phil
Phil1923 said:Hi Kutty Joe, I'll post an "Orton" effect image which took minutes in Photopaint but would be torture in Photoshop.Phil
The only way that's possible is if it's using some very specific tool that is not available in Photoshop. Which is possible. Generally speaking, Photoshop has the best, and the most, but it doesn't have the best of everything.
This tutorial seems to show how to do it in like 4 easy steps in Photoshop.
http://www.shutterevolve.com/create-orton-effect-photoshop/