The image is badly processed. And badly shot. I'm guessing it was an HDR? because the whole thing looks like an architects mockup. Unrealistic looking. Shadows are too light midtone contrast is crap.
And I'm not sure a polarising filter would have removed it but the coating on the window glass is creating a bad patchy effect that the photographer should have been aware of .
3/10
Here's another one just look at the glare on the TV screen and the blown out edges of the acrylic. This image is to print at 60"
David Milisock said:No they're introducing an iPad into their work flow. Who knows how some of the editing was done.
You said earlier:
I do have the TIF created from the photographer which I had to down sample for posting. This is the issue, bad screen, bad environment bad use of technology.
And:
It was shot with a Nikon D810 the tif image I got was last processed in Adobe PS CC 2017
For the image opening this bad thread. I don't think after a quick scan through the rest of the thread you were quite as forth coming about sources.
Who is "introducing an iPad into their work-flow"? The photographer? So what? If they can do this poorly using a good camera and LR, the iPad should only make the obvious more obvious.
Geez, David. What a crusade. It's tilting at windmills.