Hi David,
What's wrong with you ? ?
Do you think that you are supplying us with valuable information by posting that a small iPod is not the equal of a 28" LCD plus an 8 core processor ? ?And then implying that very few people on this forum were aware of that.
What's wrong with you is two fold.1. You're in an endless attack mode.
2. You are delusional about your own capabilities.
In any case, a few minutes work made a rather decent image of your terrible iPad image.It was easily done in Photopaint 6. My 28" monitor cost $287 and the computer cost $750.Phil
David Milisock said:...So you can understand why this photographer and the iWorkflow doesn't make the grade.
You've already stated that the photographer isn't using the iPad in their workflow. Just for showing the client. You also haven't looked yet at the original photo on an iPad or any other iDevice for that matter.
And I haven't looked at the original on an iPad either. It is entirely possible the defects are hard to spot on the iPad. But I would doubt it.
I was ask to be there to observe when the senior buyer discussed the issues with him and viewed the images. He used a cloud server and viewed the images on the iPad and what ever viewer he used, I observed and didn't interact. The quality looked more like Windows photo then a real image editor. Just awful! Using the iPad to show the client introduces that device into the work flow, proofing be it hard copy or screen is as important as any other aspect. My advice is for these people to get their act together.
His take was that the images were not perfect but fine and the output provider was at fault. Unfortunately for him performance was the issue and the output provider had a 23 year history with the buyer.
It's all fun and games until someone loses a ton of money and a client.