Hi Everybody,
Is this a serious problem or a bug.
Many mid to high level cameras do not embed a profile. They simply give the name of the color space in the EXIF data -- usually either sRGB or Adobe RGB. For Adobe RGB, that saves bout 500 Kb.
So here's the "problem" or "bug".
CDGS has chosen to ignore the EXIF data both on both OPEN and SAVE.
Before I realized what was happening, I would occasionally take a shot in Adobe RGB if the scene looked colorful. It always came out looking a lot duller on the monitor.No kidding. Photopaint assumed that it was in sRGB. Photopaint never realized that the shot was in Adobe RGB.
I still avoid taking photos in Adobe RGB. I'm not about to carry a notebook with me to record the color space of each shot.Photopaint should get its act together on EXIF data.
Then again, crashes and missing CPT thumbnails are a much bigger issue, I have to use CDGS X6. I'll probably pass on CDGS X8. Who needs the aggravation for almost nothing in return.
Phil
I'm not there to see your camera so I do not know but I've never seen a camera that would allow captures in more that 1 color space that would not embed profiles. I'm betting your camera embeds profiles. In a color managed process embedding profiles is a must. Adobe RGB is 560 bytes not 500kb.
EXIF data is not the place to embed a profile as image editors would not look there to see it.
Depending on your default CM settings once the image is opened it may already be too late.
Photo-PAINT under the file menu document settings shows EXIF data for a JPG I opened.
After reading up on this EXIF data I want it stripped form my images.
Hi David,
Well, explain these two different warnings from Photopaint and Photoshop. (The color management default settings were identical.)
I'm not interested in the EXIF data either.So what ??A good many photographers want to see it. The PSP photography group specifically asks that it be included. Roy has repeatedly asked for it.
Why does CDGS go out of its way to strip it out of the file. The reasons for stripping it out given by Tony Severenook are incomprehensible.Are you pushing to keep it removed just because you and I don't use it.Phil
Phil1923 said:THAT'S A BUG IN PHOTOPAINT
Maybe I need to test PS and PP on my systems, please send a file straight from the camera to davidmilisock@graphictechnology.com
Phil1923 said:You're giving Corel the wrong impression by constantly saying that you have no use for EXIF data.
No I'm giving Corel my impressions I don't need EXIF.
David Milisock said:No I'm giving Corel my impressions I don't need EXIF.
You are such a hindrance on what GDGS needs; all you want to push is crap for your little sign business.
Wow you do get it. I don't care and if I needed EXIF I'd use Paintshop Pro it works flawlessly. If the tens of thousands who want EXIF to work in PP scream about it they'll make it work.
David Milisock said:If the tens of thousands who want EXIF to work in PP scream about it they'll make it work.
I wish they would. I've been screaming about it since at least X3. It seems like any requests for improvements to PP just get ignored. There are post on this forum asking for this going back to at least 2008.
EXIF (and IPTC and GeoLocation - all metadata) data should have an option to save with JPG images on Save or Export, the same as embedding colour profiles.
I did a litlle test with a JPG file downloaded direct from camera: Both Corel PhotoPaint and Photoshop reads similar EXIF info
RoyReed said: David Milisock If the tens of thousands who want EXIF to work in PP scream about it they'll make it work. I wish they would. I've been screaming about it since at least X3. It seems like any requests for improvements to PP just get ignored. There are post on this forum asking for this going back to at least 2008. EXIF (and IPTC and GeoLocation - all metadata) data should have an option to save with JPG images on Save or Export, the same as embedding colour profiles.
David Milisock If the tens of thousands who want EXIF to work in PP scream about it they'll make it work.
I do not disagree, it has no value for me but WHEN THE MASSES SCREAM one would think Corel would need to listen.
Since you're a level headed individual, I'll go off in this direction with the discussion. I seek enlightenment only.
My assumption is that the EXIF data is relevant only to the original capture or is it updated for post capture edits?
If that data is not relevant for edited images what use is it?
I process hundreds of images for output and they are so far removed from the original captured version that they are truly different images. So what would I benefit from that data being in my file?
BTW don't ask McAfee about that geolocation stuff.
It reads it but when you save as or edit the file and save it's lost. I believe.
David Milisock said: It reads it but when you save as or edit the file and save it's lost. I believe.
OK, second test: Open the same file, "save as" a different name, on different dolder. Close the program, open the program again and the same EXIF information is present on File / document propierties
When I saved and renamed an image from my cell phone it lost the EXIF data. maybe it's the renaming?