Let's stop calling bits per channel "color depth"

Hi Everybody,

I have a new crusade.

"Color depth" is a poor choice of words for 8 bits/channel vs. 16 bits/channel.
There is no "depth".  What's "deeper" about bits/channel.
The range of colors is identical in any color space for either choice.

The difference is the total number of gradations of color -- 16 million vs trillions.

I don't have a good name for it.  Perhaps "color resolution" ? ?

Phil

Parents
  • Crusades can be tiring. They can end up in defeat. They can also end up being not much more than tilting at windmills.

    There's all sorts of historically inaccurate things about color and just about any other subject that can try a person's resolve in seeing the larger body who use certain terms change from their historical inaccuracies. About the best you will be able to do is use your preferred language and be ready to explain what you mean if it is not readily recognized by the readership.

    Color depth is also commonly called bit depth, which I think is more accurate. I view your preferred term(s) of "gradations of color = color resolution" as explaining the ramifications of greater/lesser bit depths.

    Good luck...
Reply Children
No Data