I would think with at great photo editor like PhotoPaint there would be more 'Photo' chatter.
Hi Rikk,
cool question... Might it be that PP is so intuitive that it presents it's own answers to artistic problems? After all, navigating Photoshop (and the rest of the Mud Hutter stuff) can be a little like swimming in glue. I was a little concerned to read about an issue concerning the smear tool being broken in X5 though. In all, after spending time reading here, it's beginning to sound like that X5 is the first 'odd numbered' iteration to be a 'buggy' one. Going back a few years I recall that versions 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and X3 were all good from the get-go, as opposed to the even numbers, and yet I read all kinds of complaints here about X5. Just an observation after having used CD for a number of years.
Best,
Paul
Paul Johnson said:Might it be that PP is so intuitive that it presents it's own answers to artistic problems?
It's really all I use for bitmap editing, I fly in PP. I tweak it quite a bit, and made some macros for myself.
The 2 big things:
I am surprised at the lack of sharing compared to photoshop users, PhotoPaint seems to be a lesser product with sharing how to. I use coreldraw 95% since switching from adobe suites for vectors with 5% going to xara for minor things.
I still use photoshop cs4 80%, ease of use for me. That is an improvement, a year ago it was 100%. I am desiring to know and use pp 100%.
The is for photoshop users.....Would love this type active forum for pp.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?src=fftb#!/PhotoshopUser